In a custody dispute between Mohammad M. and Sara R., the Appellate Division, First Department upheld the New York County Family Court's decision to grant the father primary legal and physical custody of their child. The ruling was based on a careful evaluation of the child’s best interests, weighing both parents’ ability to provide a stable and supportive environment.
Sara R. had been the child’s primary caregiver for several years, but evidence presented during the hearing demonstrated that Mohammad was better equipped to address the child’s educational and emotional needs. The court reviewed testimony and documentary records, which revealed that after relocating to Tennessee with the father, the child’s school attendance and academic performance had significantly improved, and a medical condition known as "encopresis" had been resolved. In contrast, while under the mother’s care, the child had frequently missed school or arrived late, and faced a lack of stability in her home life. Considering these circumstances, the Family Court determined that transferring custody to the father was in the child’s best interest.
On appeal, Sara challenged the decision, arguing that she had been deprived of her right to legal representation. However, the AD1 found no merit in this claim. While she had been assigned two attorneys, but both withdrew due to communication issues. In response, the court appointed her a legal advisor to assist her through the proceedings. While she sought the appointment of a third attorney, the court refused, determining that this did not amount to coercion or a violation of her rights. The AD1 agreed, concluding that she had been provided adequate legal support.
Finding no legal errors, the AD1 affirmed the custody order without costs. (The mother's remaining arguments were reviewed but deemed "unpersuasive.")
# # #
DECISION