1250 Broadway, 27th Floor New York, NY 10001

EVICTED FOR AIRBNB-ING

39 Fifth Avenue, Manhattan. Image credit: CityLand

Rent-stabilized tenant substantially profited from 93 individual Airbnb sublettings. In 2010, Linda Lipetz was diagnosed with cancer and was unable to work for over a year. From March 2011 to August 2012, in order to subsidize her rent, Lipetz sublet her rent-regulated apartment located at 39 Fifth Avenue in Greenwich Village. Lipetz hosted 93 different people for 338 total days through Airbnb, charging a nightly rate of $95 for one person and $120 for two, and generating $33,592 in revenue.

The landlord, Shari Lynn Goldstein, discovered the subletting in 2012 and sued to evict Lipetz and recover lost rent. Lipetz did not deny renting the apartment, but argued that the people who sublet her apartment were “roommates” under State law and that the subletting did not violate the Rent Stabilization Code. The Supreme Court denied Goldstein’s motion for summary judgment, finding that there were material issues of fact. Goldstein appealed.

The Appellate Division, First Department, reversed, granted summary judgment for Goldstein and evicted Lipetz. The Court ruled that Lipetz sublet the apartment in a systematic fashion and for a substantial length of time, and therefore could be evicted. The Rent Stabilization Code allows for an otherwise lawful sublet of a furnished rent-stabilized apartment for a maximum of 110 percent of the rent. Lipetz could have legally sublet her apartment for a maximum of $63.58 a day. The allowable rate would have generated $21,490—$12,000 less than Lipetz’s actual revenue of $33,592.

Goldstein v. Lipetz, 150 A.D.3d 562 (1st Dep’t 2017).

Categories: