by Brigitte Gabriel
Since 1984, I've been covering the Middle East, terrorism, and the
intersection with America's foreign policy.
Over the course of my career, I have spent countless hours in television
studios under glaring lights and in front of cameras, both as a professional
news anchor for World News at Middle East Television and as the President of
ACT! for America warning Americans about the threat from Jihad.
I'm not “just” a survivor. I went to work to understand
the world around me. I am proud of my Lebanese roots, but as a Christian
targeted for my faith, and a woman, subjugation was a virtual guarantee.
I immigrated to the United States. That's where freedom is. It's
in our founding documents; it's in our blood.
I always welcome the opportunity to appear on television to discuss what
I consider to be the most important topic facing America today: the threat
to our national security posed by Jihadists around the globe.
I was pleased to accept an invitation to appear on
CNN’s
Reliable Sources, on Sunday morning to discuss the issue of so-called “Islamophobia
.”
Unfortunately, what transpired in the production and editing process at
CNN was one of the most egregious examples of biased journalism that I
have ever come across.
Some background is in order here.
First of all, the whole issue of “Islamophobia” is a bogus
one. The term was created from whole cloth by the Organization for Islamic
Cooperation (OIC) in an effort to suppress free speech and stifle justifiable
criticism of Islamic regimes.
Headquartered in Saudi Arabia, the 57-member nation OIC is the largest
international organization in the world outside of the United Nations.
The OIC is absolutely dominated by its host nation, Saudi Arabia, which
is ruled by one of the most barbaric Shariah regimes on the planet.
The term “Islamophobia” first appeared in Western media in
the 1980s when it was used to lay proverbial siege to British author and
Muslim apostate Salman Rushdie for his book
The Satanic Verses, which was viewed by many Muslims as insulting the Prophet Muhammed. (Readers
may recall that the leader of OIC member nation Iran, Ayatollah Ruhollah
Khomeini, issued a fatwa calling on Muslims to kill Rushdie.)
Essentially, the OIC works to outlaw any and all criticism of Islamic
leaders, customs, legal codes and regimes. The OIC considers virtually
any negative portrayal (whether genuine, professed or supposed) of Islam
to be “Islamophobia.”
So,
the entire
Reliable Sources segment was to be framed around a term that is essentially a product of
Islamist propaganda
. Note that despite the fact that host Brian Stelter parrots OIC propaganda
on “Islamophobia” right from the opening of the show, he fraudulently
portrays his program as “objective” between the Right and
the Left, the Red and the Blue.
As I learned all-too well,
Reliable Sources is anything BUT unbiased.
The original taping of the segment was about 30 minutes long, but just
over 13 minutes made it on air. The editing was sloppy and disjointed,
leaving out important parts of the dialogue.
Brian Stelter started right in by mocking Fox News’ Sean Hannity
for his reference to worldwide Jihad. Later he said that the terrorist
threat was “not there.” How can Stelter
possibly deny that Jihad is in fact a global threat? Just look at this list of
Jihadist terrorist organizations that have launched attacks around the world in
just the past month:
• Abu Sayyaf
• Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb
• Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula
• HAMAS
• Hezbollah
• Boko Haram
• Al Shabaab
• Lashkar e Taiba
• Jemaah Islamiyah
And ironically, CNN itself reported on the arrests just a week ago of two
men in Texas on terrorism charges.
My appearance on
Reliable Sources was opposite Linda Sarsour of the Arab American Association of New York.
Again, some background is in order here. Sarsour has a lengthy history
of denying the threat from terrorism and attacking the NYPD and FBI for
their counterterror efforts, just as she did on
Reliable Sources on Sunday. Some of her denials can only be categorized in the “crackpot”
classification.
For instance, when Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was arrested for trying to
blow up an airliner over Detroit on Christmas Day in 2009 and subsequently
convicted and sentenced to life in prison in 2012, Sarsour claimed that
the plot was not the work of Al Qaeda, but was a CIA plot.
Sarsour has cited the cases of Fahad Hashmi, Aafia Siddiqui and Siraj
Matin as proof of US government abuses of Muslim civil rights by the FBI
and NYPD. Hashmi pleaded guilty to providing material support for Al Qaeda.
Siddiqui was found guilty of the attempted murder of a US Army captain
and sentenced to 86 years in prison. Matin pleaded guilty and was sentenced
to 30 years for plotting to explode bombs in the New York subway system.
During the part of the segment that actually made it on the air, Sarsour
ridiculously equated isolated incidents of violence involving non-Muslims
with Jihad. Sarsour even had the gall to cite the Boston Marathon bombings
as an example of media “Islamophobia,” ignoring the fact that
the perpetrators were in fact Islamic jihadists.
The reality is that the numbers don’t lie. The overwhelming majority
of terrorist attacks in the world today are in fact acts of Islamic jihad.
That is an inconvenient truth that Ms. Sarsour evidently wants the rest
of America to live with. But don’t depend on CNN and its producers
to tell the truth about that.