Found guilty of a series of crimes, which included rape in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentenced to a term of 23 years, Jason Moczo went to the Appellate Division, First Department, claiming the evidence presented at his trial didn't support the outcome.
While Moczo believed an inquiry into his prior burglary conviction was prejudicial, the AD1 thought that information was "probative" of the guy's credibility.
It also found no error in the lower court's decision to allow a 911 recording into evidence, as it supported the victim's testimony (and was admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule).
No te conozco, Moczo.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. Moczo