WHAT HAPPENS WHEN LAWYER HAS ALZHEIMER'S?
In Shapiro v. Kurtzman, the Rockland County Supreme Court dismissed a case brought against Deborah Shapiro Kurtzman -- in July of 2004 -- after Milton B. Shapiro failed to respond to discovery.
A little over a year later, when his attorney was diagnosed with Alzheimer's, Milton reinstated his complaint against Kurtzman claiming that his attorney didn't "properly represent him."
After considering an expert's affidavit which provided that in the earliest stages of Alzheimer's "there are noticeable deficits in demanding job situations," the Rockland County Supreme Court concluded that counsel's "mental illness" rendered the lawsuit's dismissal inappropriate. However, it imposed a $10,000 sanction against Milton and directed he answer all "outstanding interrogatories within 60 days."
On appeal, the Appellate Division, Second Department, agreed the attorney's incapacity vitiated any deliberateness and concurred with the lawsuit's reinstatement and conditions imposed.
Sorry ... but we forgot the point of this post.
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Shapiro v. Kurtzman
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.nyrealestatelawblog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2680
Comments
A $10,000 sanction is reasonable because the plaintiff's lawyer had Alzheimer's and failed to respond to some stupid interrogatory?
Do they print their motions to preclude on Golden Tablets in Rockland County?
Has some prankster attached a canister of nitrous oxide to the HVAC system at 45 Monroe Place?
Posted by: Gines Pasamonte | July 11, 2008 3:15 PM