New York Real Estate Lawyers New York OFFICE 225 Broadway, 8th Floor New York, NY 10007
Blog Home Attorney Profiles Firm News Community Newsletters Clients Rights Contact Us

« COP GETS NO CHANGE | Main | WHAT WAS PASCHAL'S THEORY? »

TO DO: LEAVE "TO-DO LIST" AT HOME!

todo.JPGIn People v. Naradzay, Jason Naradzay was convicted of two counts of attempted murder in the second degree, attempted burglary in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree.

Apparently, Naradzay was planning a double homicide, but before he could follow through with the murders, police apprehended him, uncovered a shotgun resting "5 to 10 feet away" from his person and a "to-do list" which outlined the plan.

After an Onondaga County Supreme Court jury found him guilty, Naradzay appealed to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which reiterated that a person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime when he is "so near to its accomplishment that in all reasonable probability the crime" would have been committed had police not intervened. According to the AD4, Naradzay's "to-do list," his loaded shotgun, and his close proximity to his intended victims' home went "far beyond mere preparation" and supported the conviction.

A lone dissenter -- Justice Green -- had a problem with that.

Since the law "does not punish evil thoughts," Green thought the defendant shouldn't have been convicted of attempted murder and attempted burglary because Naradzay wasn't "'very near' or 'dangerously near'" to committing the acts because he was "some distance away" from his intended victims' driveway and his weapon was found some "5 to 10 feet away" from him. (Interestingly, the intended victims were also "out of town at the time of the incident.")

To-do: Take an appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals!

j0288938.gif

To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. Naradzay 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.nyrealestatelawblog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2780

Comments

I think I know the man convicted of this crime. And frankly, he is probably guilty of "stupidity" and nothing more.

If the intended "victims" were not at home, how can you charge and then convict a man of attempted murder?

Perhaps he would have had a dramatic change of mind and simply gone home. I am willing to bet that similar "crimes" are being committed on a daily basis in places like New York and Boston, and those convicted receive far less punishment than the 15 years of hard time that this man received.

Just my two cents.

Thanks for your visiting, Nick.

We appreciate your insights.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Search


Subscribe










Categories