WAS THIS ARBITRATION TOO MULTI-FACETED?
In Elul Diamonds Co. Ltd. v. Z Kor Diamonds, Inc., Z Kor Diamonds asked a court to confirm an $185,226 arbitration award which had been issued in its favor.
Arbitration awards are usually upheld as long as the arbitrator can offer a "barely colorable justification" for the outcome. Here, Elul Diamonds contested the arbitrator's "jurisdiction" -- or authority -- to entertain the dispute.
Both the New York County Supreme Court and Appellate Division, First Department, found the arbitrator's conclusion the dispute arose from a New York consignment transaction -- and was thus empowered to hear the case -- reasonable.
In any event, Elul lost the ability to object to the arbitrators' authority since it appeared in the case, "advanced substantive legal arguments," and interposed non-jurisdictional claims.
Was Elul stoned?
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Elul Diamonds Co. Ltd. v. Z Kor Diamonds, Inc.
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.nyrealestatelawblog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2317














Comments
Think before you buy a diamond:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgqd80026xU
Posted by: Gines Pasamonte | June 27, 2008 10:29 AM
Diamonds are forever, Ginesy!
Want me to get you one?
Posted by: ALesbo | June 27, 2008 10:48 AM
BRING YOUR OWN BOI TOI!!!
Posted by: ALesbo | June 27, 2008 11:01 AM