New York Real Estate Lawyers New York OFFICE 225 Broadway, 8th Floor New York, NY 10007
Blog Home Attorney Profiles Firm News Community Newsletters Clients Rights Contact Us

« NEWMAN IN THE TIMES: PAYING THE RENT | Main | QUIRROZ WANTS TO SHIP YOU TO SIBERIA! »

HOW DO YOU DEFINE PROSTITUTION?

In People v. Corona, Irais Corona challenge the legality -- or facial sufficiency -- of the prostitution charge brought against her.

A person is guilty of prostitution when s/he “engages or agrees or offers to engage in sexual conduct with another person for a fee.” However, the papers accusing Corona of this crime stated that she “engaged, agreed, and offered to engage in sexual conduct with another person for a fee.”

Corona argued that the use of the conjunctive -- “and” -- instead of the disjunctive -- “or” -- required prosecutors to show that she actually participated in sexual activity. 

The New York County Criminal Court disagreed and was of the opinion that prosecutors only needed to show any one of the three acts to establish the crime’s commission.

Was someone prostituting the English language?

To download a copy of the Criminal Court’s decision, please use this link: People v. Corona

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.nyrealestatelawblog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2283

Comments

Bravo -- another valiant effort by our guardians of virtue to keep a dangerous public enemy off the streets.

The court makes a common error in the decision by describing "or" as a "disjunction." "Or" is only a disjunction in the context of logic:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_disjunction

In grammar, such as in the statute in question, "or" is a coordinating conjunction:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_conjunction. Either way, defendant loses on this one.

$35 for sexual intercourse?

Dinner alone costs me $200!

TAKE MY WIFE PLEASE!

It seems there is a lot of prostitution going on here!

Tatala, I'll charge you only $15 if you let me stick a [DELETED] up your [DELETED].

Stupid [DELETED]!

Is this all a subliminal plug for "Secret Diary of a Call Girl," premiering tonight on Showtime (right after "Weeds" -- a great show)?

http://www.sho.com/site/secretdiary/home.do

Hey Lesbo,

I'll teach his (DELETED). You can come over and (DELETED) me, (DELETED) me and (DELETED) my (DELETED) any time.

I have the Sawzall.

Tralala,

You have a ready wit. Tell me when it's ready.

HY

IT is out shopping at the moment.

Me, I just got back from a pleasure trip.

I took my mother-in-law to the airport.

You see, Lesbo ... My wife and I have the secret to making a marriage last.

Two times a week, we go to a nice restaurant, a little wine, good food.

She goes Tuesdays, I go Fridays.

One more, and I'm going to start charging you a royalty, Sy.

HY

I find this whole exchange offensive and puerile.

All women are not prostitutes and we are certainly not sex toys.

Says who?

Maybe Maria would like us all to volunteer to be treated by the Ludovico Technique:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludovico_Technique

Gines must be into women of ill repute.

ALesbo?

PENIS! Yuck!

Do not betray your sisters Ginesy (There are consequences.)

Well done, Gines!

(This was all about grammar. So why is everyone else fousing on sex?)

Onward!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Search


Subscribe










Categories